BROWN v. FERRARA et al, No. 2:2010cv00523 - Document 158 (D. Me. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 122 Report and Recommendations granting 74 Motion for Summary Judgment By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine CRAIG A. BROWN, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL FERRARA, et al., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:10-cv-523-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on June 7, 2011, her Recommended Decision (Docket No. 122). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 130) on June 23, 2011. Defendant Coffin Engineering & Surveying, Inc. filed its Opposition to Plaintiff s Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 133) on June 28, 2011. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Coffin Engineering s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 74) is GRANTED on Plaintiff s federal claims and as to Plaintiff s state law claims as against this Defendant, they are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 21st day of July, 2011.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
