LACOURSE v. HALLKEEN MANAGEMENT INC, No. 2:2010cv00420 - Document 32 (D. Me. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 29 Report and Recommendations and 13 Motion for Summary Judgment By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine KEITH LACOURSE, Plaintiff v. HALLKEEN MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:10-cv-420-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on August 31, 2011, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 29). Defendant filed its Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 30) on September 19, 2011. Plaintiff filed his Opposition to Defendant s Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 31) on October 6, 2011. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 13) is DENIED. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 13th day of October, 2011.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
