MCCORMICK et al v. FESTIVA DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC et al, No. 2:2009cv00365 - Document 56 (D. Me. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 48 Report and Recommendations; denying 7 Motion to Dismiss; denying 14 Motion to Dismiss By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine ALISON McCORMICK, et al., Plaintiff v. FESTIVA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, et al, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 09-365-P-S ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on February 12, 2010, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 48). Defendant Rangeley Lake Resort Development Co. filed its Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 51) on February 19, 2010. Plaintiffs filed their Response to Defendant s Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 53) on March 5, 2010. Defendant Rangeley Lake Resort Development Co. filed its Reply to Plaintiffs Response to its Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 55) on March 11, 2010. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Rangeley Lake Development Group, LLC s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 7) is DENIED. 3. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Festiva Development Group, LLC s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 14) is DENIED. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated at Portland, Maine this 18th day of March, 2010.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.