ZIEHM v. RADIOSHACK CORPORATION, No. 2:2009cv00069 - Document 92 (D. Me. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 85 Report and Recommendations; granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion to Strike. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ZIEHM v. RADIOSHACK CORPORATION Doc. 92 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine JOSEPH T. ZIEHM, Plaintiff v. RADIOSHACK CORPORATION, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 09-69-P-S ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 22, 2010, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 85). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 86) on June 8, 2010. Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiff s Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 91) on June 29, 2010. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant s Motion to Strike (Docket No. 62) is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART. Dockets.Justia.com 3. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 36 ) is GRANTED. /s/ George Z. Singal United States District Judge Dated: July 1, 2010
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
