COMMEAU v. MAGNUSSON, No. 1:2021cv00055 - Document 7 (D. Me. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 3 Report and Recommendations. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (slg)

Download PDF
COMMEAU v. MAGNUSSON Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MICHAEL EDWARD COMMEAU, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. 1:21-cv-00055-NT ) ) ) ) ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On March 2, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court, with a copy to the Petitioner, his Recommended Decision on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 3). The Petitioner filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on March 24, 2021 (ECF No. 6). I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Petitioner’s objection is OVERRULED and that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Dockets.Justia.com The Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition (ECF No. 1) is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal, because no jurist of reason would find the correctness of this ruling to be debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen United States District Judge Dated this 21st day of April, 2021. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.