RATTRAY v. WILLETTE et al, No. 1:2020cv00429 - Document 8 (D. Me. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 . By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
RATTRAY v. WILLETTE et al Doc. 8 Case 1:20-cv-00429-GZS Document 8 Filed 03/02/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ARES JOSEPH RATTRAY, Plaintiff, v. ALLISON WILLETTE, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:20-cv-00429-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 7) filed February 4, 2021, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff’s ability to assert a negligence claim in state court. _/s/ George Z. Singal __ United States District Judge Dated this 2nd day of March, 2021. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
