BURR et al v. BOUFFARD et al, No. 1:2020cv00206 - Document 20 (D. Me. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 17 Granting in Part and Denying in Part 14 Motion to Dismiss By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH) Modified on 3/2/2021 to add docket text re: motion to dismiss (lrt).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BURR et al v. BOUFFARD et al Doc. 20 Case 1:20-cv-00206-GZS Document 20 Filed 03/02/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 260 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine DOUGLAS BURR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RODNEY BOUFFARD, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:20-cv-00206-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 29, 2021, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 17). Defendants filed their Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18) on February 12, 2021. Plaintiffs filed their Response to Defendant’s Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 19) on February 25, 2021. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is ORDERED Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff Rebbecca Burr’s § 1983 claim based on the denial of contact visits, as to Plaintiff Rebbecca Burr’s defamation claim, as to Plaintiff Douglas Burr’s claim for injunctive relief based on the events of June 2014, and as to Plaintiff Douglas Burr’s claim for damages based on the events of June 2014, except for damages Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-00206-GZS Document 20 Filed 03/02/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 261 related to Defendants’ failure to afford Plaintiff Douglas Burr a meaningful review of his segregation status. The Motion is otherwise DENIED. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 2nd day of March, 2021.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
