ADAMS v. MAGNUSSON et al, No. 1:2019cv00547 - Document 117 (D. Me. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE denying 100 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and TRO; adopting 103 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ADAMS v. MAGNUSSON et al Doc. 117 Case 1:19-cv-00547-GZS Document 117 Filed 07/27/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1462 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JON R. ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Docket no. 1:19-cv-00547-GZS ) ) ) ) ) ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on July 6, 2021, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 103). Plaintiff filed a belated Reply (ECF No. 104) on July 9, 2021, and his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 105) on July 14, 2021. Defendants Averill & LeClair then filed their Response (ECF No. 116) to these filings on July 27, 2021. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the filings just noted and the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 103) is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 100) is hereby DENIED. SO ORDERED. /s/ George Z. Singal United States District Judge Dated this 27th day of July, 2021. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
