ADAMS v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al, No. 1:2019cv00471 - Document 15 (D. Me. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 as supplemented 13 . By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ADAMS v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al Doc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine HERBERT M. ADAMS IV, Plaintiff, v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:19-cv-00471-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on December 12, 2019, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 10) and on January 22, 2020 his Supplemental Recommended Decision (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 14) on February 6, 2020. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is ORDERED that based on the analysis set forth in the Recommended Decision and in the Supplement to the Recommended Decision and after review of the pleadings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§1915 and 1915A, the Plaintiff’s Complaint, as amended, is hereby DISMISSED. th Dated this 10 day of February, 2020. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ Judge, U.S. District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
