ADAMS v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, No. 1:2018cv00446 - Document 11 (D. Me. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 7 Report and Recommendations for 8 Motion to Reopen Case and 9 Report and Recommended Decision for 6 Motion to Reopen Case. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mnw)

Download PDF
ADAMS v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JUSTAN ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 1:18-CV-446-NT ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On May 6, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a motion to reopen the case (ECF No. 6). On May 28, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copy to the Plaintiff, his Recommended Decision on Plaintiff’s motion to reopen the case. Recommended Decision (ECF No. 7). On May 28, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a second motion to reopen the case (ECF No. 8). On June 6, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copy to the Plaintiff, his Recommended Decision on Plaintiff’s second motion to reopen the case. Recommended Decision (ECF No. 9). I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decisions, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision. I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Dockets.Justia.com It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decisions of the Magistrate Judge are hereby AFFIRMED and the Plaintiff’s motions to reopen the case are hereby DENIED. I hereby place Justan Adams on Notice that filing restrictions “may be in the offing.” Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island, 985 F.2d 32, 35 (1st Cir. 1993). This represents the “cautionary order” of which Cok speaks. Id. Groundless and inappropriate filings will not be tolerated. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen__________________ United States District Judge Dated this 11th day of July, 2019. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.