DRESSER et al v. NORMS et al, No. 1:2018cv00426 - Document 8 (D. Me. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting 7 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
DRESSER et al v. NORMS et al Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JAY PARKER LUNT DRESSER, PLAINTIFF V. ROBERT A. NORMS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:18-CV-426-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On January 2, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision on Plaintiff’s Complaint. The time within which to file objections expired on January 16, 2019, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the plaintiff that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED. I hereby place Jay Parker Lunt Dresser on NOTICE that filing restrictions “may be in the offing.” Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island, 985 F.2d 32, 35 (1st Cir. 1993). This represents the “cautionary order” of which Cok speaks. Id. Groundless and inappropriate filings will not be tolerated. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
