GLADU v. WALTZ et al, No. 1:2018cv00275 - Document 114 (D. Me. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 85 . By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GLADU v. WALTZ et al Doc. 114 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine NICHOLAS GLADU, Plaintiff v. GARY WALTZ, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:18-cv-00275-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 22, 2019, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 85). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 96) on June 10, 2019. The Defendants Josh Black, Casey Chadwick and Gary Waltz filed a Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 112) on June 24, 2019. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. Dockets.Justia.com 2. It is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 59) is hereby DENIED. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: June 26, 2019
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
