DRESSER v. AT&T et al, No. 1:2018cv00248 - Document 8 (D. Me. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 6 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (akr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
DRESSER v. AT&T et al Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JAY P. DRESSER, On Behalf of Employees of ATT&T and Time Warner, Plaintiff, v. AT&T, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:18-cv-00248-JDL ) ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate, Judge John C. Nivison, filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 6) with the Court on September 5, 2018, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2018), recommending that the Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The time within which to file objections expired September 19, 2018, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED. The Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED. Dated this 11th day of October, 2018. /s/ Jon D. Levy U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
