TUCK v. CITY OF GARDINER POLICE DEPARTMENT et al, No. 1:2018cv00212 - Document 62 (D. Me. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 56 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (akr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
TUCK v. CITY OF GARDINER POLICE DEPARTMENT et al Doc. 62 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MICHAEL A. TUCK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GARDINER POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) 1:18-cv-00212-JDL ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge John H. Rich III filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 56) with the Court on December 23, 2019, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2020) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), regarding dismissal of the complaint as to David Timms for lack of service. The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge provided notice that a party’s failure to object would waive the right to de novo review and appeal. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record and have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision. I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. Dockets.Justia.com It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 56) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice as to Defendant David Timms. SO ORDERED. Dated this 6th day of February, 2020. /s/ Jon D. Levy CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
