ARSENAULT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 1:2018cv00198 - Document 20 (D. Me. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: accepting 19 Report and Recommendations re: 15 SS Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (tcs)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ARSENAULT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE EUGENE A., Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) 1:18-cv-00198-JDL ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge John H. Rich, III, filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 19) on Plaintiff Eugene A.’s Social Security Disability and Supplemental Security Income appeal with the Court on June 5, 2019, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2019) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The time within which to file objections expired on June 19, 2019, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. Having reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, I concur with the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions as set forth in his Recommended Decision. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 19) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED and the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. Dated this 30th day of July, 2019. /s/ Jon D. Levy CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
