YOUNG v. PROGRESSIVE INS CO, No. 1:2018cv00197 - Document 41 (D. Me. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 38 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
YOUNG v. PROGRESSIVE INS CO Doc. 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MAURICE D. YOUNG, Individually, And on behalf of minor, T.A.Y., Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE INS. CO., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:18-cv-197-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 38) was filed January 31, 2019. No objections were filed. Instead, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend (ECF No. 40) on February 15, 2019. The proposed Amended Complaint does not cure the defects in the initial complaint. The Motion to Amend is DENIED. The Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30) is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. _/s/ George Z. Singal __ United States District Judge Dated this 25th day of February, 2019. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
