VIOLETTE v. RIPLEY et al, No. 1:2017cv00027 - Document 10 (D. Me. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE mooting 5 Motion to Compel; mooting 6 Motion for Leave to File; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 9 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mjlt)

Download PDF
VIOLETTE v. RIPLEY et al Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE, PLAINTIFF V. NORTHERN MAINE REGIONAL REENTRY CENTER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:17-CV-27-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On March 21, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision After Screening Complaint Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The time within which to file objections expired on April 4, 2017, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the plaintiff that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED. The plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 5) and motion for leave (ECF No. 6) are MOOT. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.