JAMES v. BUENO et al, No. 1:2016cv00416 - Document 82 (D. Me. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE denying 63 Motion Request for Immediate Relief ; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 73 on 63 Motion for Immediate Relief filed by MICHEAL J JAMES By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (MMB)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
JAMES v. BUENO et al Doc. 82 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MICHAEL JAMES, Plaintiff, v. ERIC BUENO, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) Docket no. 1:16-cv-416-NT ) ) ) ) ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On December 12, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision. (ECF No. 73). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Plaintiff’s request for immediate relief (ECF No. 63) is DENIED. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen United States Chief District Judge Dated this 4th day of January, 2017. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
