MOORE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al, No. 1:2016cv00398 - Document 117 (D. Me. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - adopting 111 Report and Recommendations; denying 89 Motion for Order for Medical Services; denying 101 Motion Requesting Judicial Review De Novo and denying 110 Second MOTION Requesting Judicial Review. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mnw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MOORE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al Doc. 117 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE WALTER WILLIAM MOORE a/k/a Nikki Natasha Petrovickov, Plaintiff, v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 1:16-cv-398-NT ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On May 4, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copy to the parties, his Recommended Decision on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Order of Medical Services (ECF No. 89), Plaintiff’s First Motion Requesting Judicial Review (ECF No. 101), and Plaintiff’s Second Motion Requesting Judicial Review (ECF No. 110). Recommended Decision (ECF No. 111). The Plaintiff filed two objections to the Recommended Decision on May 24, 2018 (ECF Nos. 112 and 114). The Defendants Correct Care Solutions, Robert Clinton, M.D., and Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated filed a response to the Plaintiff’s objection. (ECF No. 115). I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision. I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED and the Plaintiff’s Motion for Order of Medical Services Dockets.Justia.com (ECF No. 89), the Plaintiff’s First Motion Requesting Judicial Review (ECF No. 101), and the Plaintiff’s Second Motion Requesting Judicial Review (ECF No. 110) are DENIED. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen__________________ United States Chief District Judge Dated this 11th day of June, 2018. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
