CHAPMAN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 1:2016cv00231 - Document 23 (D. Me. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 20 Report and Recommended Decision By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (lrc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CHAPMAN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE LEE CHAPMAN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 1:16-cv-00231-JDL ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 20) on December 26, 2016, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The plaintiff, Lee Chapman (“Chapman”), filed an Objection to the Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 21) on January 10, 2017, and the defendant, Commissioner Colvin (“Commissioner”), filed the Government’s Response on January 23, 2017 (ECF No. 22). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by it. I concur with all of the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions as set forth in his recommendation and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. 1 Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. Dated this 10th day of February 2017. /s/Jon D.Levy___________ U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
