WILLIAMS v. WALDO COUNTY MAINE DEPUTY MERL REED et al, No. 1:2016cv00211 - Document 62 (D. Me. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE, adopting 55 Report and Recommendations By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
WILLIAMS v. WALDO COUNTY MAINE DEPUTY MERL REED et al Doc. 62 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BRADLEY PAUL WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF V. WALDO COUNTY MAINE DEPUTY MERL REED AND BELFAST MAINE POLICE CHIEF MIKE McFADDEN, DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:16-CV-211-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On April 4, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on Plaintiff’s Motion to Enjoin. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on April 18, 2017. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff’s motion to enjoin is DENIED. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 2ND DAY OF MAY, 2017 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
