ANGELO v. CAMPUS CREST AT ORONO LLC, No. 1:2015cv00469 - Document 27 (D. Me. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE : re 17 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (ccs)

Download PDF
ANGELO v. CAMPUS CREST AT ORONO LLC Doc. 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JUSTIN ANGELO, Plaintiff, v. CAMPUS CREST AT ORONO, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. 1:15-cv-469-NT ) ) ) ) ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On February 1, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Recommended Decision on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Defendant filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on February 11, 2016 and filed a separate motion requesting oral argument. The Plaintiff filed his Response to the Defendant’s objection to the Recommended Decision on March 11, 2016. The Defendant filed a Reply on March 23, 2016. The Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike the Reply on March 29, 2016. The Defendant moved for leave to file its Reply on March 29, 2016. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision. Dockets.Justia.com It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED (ECF No. 6). The Defendant’s Motion for Oral Argument is DENIED (ECF No. 19). The Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply is GRANTED (ECF No. 25). The Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Reply is DENIED (ECF No. 24). SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen__________________ United States Chief District Judge Dated this 10th day of May, 2016.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.