COUSINS et al v. HIGGINS et al, No. 1:2014cv00515 - Document 8 (D. Me. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 . By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
COUSINS et al v. HIGGINS et al Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine ROBERT L. COUSINS, et al., Plaintiff v. KEITH HIGGINS, et al., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:14-cv-00515-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on December 11, 2014, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 6). Plaintiffs filed their Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 7) on December 24, 2014. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. Dockets.Justia.com 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants Porier, LaPrade, Kelly, Weir, Tracy Patton, Wayne Patton, Sanborn, Thomas Chisholm, Samuel Chisolm, Gilley, Jr. and John Doe #1 through John Doe #5 are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim against them pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 30th day of December, 2014.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
