DREWRY v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al, No. 1:2014cv00392 - Document 94 (D. Me. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 65 Report and Recommendations and denying 29 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; granting 39 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 42 Motion for Preliminary Injunction;. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)

Download PDF
DREWRY v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al Doc. 94 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine BRANDON B. DREWRY, Plaintiff v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, ET AL., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:14-cv-00392-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 28, 2015, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 65). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 67) on June 18, 2015. Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 69) on July 2, 2015. Defendant Dixon’s Response to Plaintiff’s Objection the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 70) on July 2, 2015. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Renewed Motions for Preliminary Injunction (ECF Nos. 29 & 42) are hereby DENIED. Dockets.Justia.com 3. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Dixon’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 39) is GRANTED. 4. The remaining orders are summarily AFFIRMED. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 28th day of September, 2015.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.