GEHRMAN et al v. TWIN RIVERS PAPER COMPANY, No. 1:2014cv00341 - Document 24 (D. Me. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 21 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (nwd)

Download PDF
GEHRMAN et al v. TWIN RIVERS PAPER COMPANY Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JAMES GEHRMAN and MICHAEL REIDER, ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:14-cv-341-JDL ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, v. TWIN RIVERS PAPER COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision on February 6, 2015, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). ECF No. 21. The plaintiffs, James Gehrman and Michael Reider, filed a Partial Objection on February 23, 2015. ECF No. 22. The defendant, Twin Rivers Paper Company, filed its Response to Plaintiffs’ Partial Objection on March 12, 2015. ECF No. 23. I have carefully reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. Twin Rivers’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) is Dockets.Justia.com GRANTED IN PART with regard to Count Four of the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7), and DENIED IN PART with regard to Counts One, Two, and Three. SO ORDERED. /s/ Jon D. Levy_______ United States District Judge Dated this 17th day of April, 2015.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.