REESE v. BOUFFARD et al, No. 1:2014cv00244 - Document 54 (D. Me. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 47 Report and Recommendations, granting 44 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and denying 51 Motion to Amend. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
REESE v. BOUFFARD et al Doc. 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine GEOFFREY REESE, Plaintiff v. ROBERT BOUFFARD, et als., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:14-cv-00244-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 28, 2015, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 47). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 50) on April 1, 2015. Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 52) on April 6, 2015. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. Dockets.Justia.com 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED. 3. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 51) is DENIED. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 29th day of April, 2015.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
