GRANT v. BOUFFARD, No. 1:2013cv00113 - Document 12 (D. Me. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 11 Report and Recommendations. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0.; dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE CHRISTOPHER GRANT, Petitioner v. RODNEY BOUFFARD, Respondent ) ) ) ) ) Docket no. 1:13-cv-00113-NT ) ) ) ) ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On July 11, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, her Report and Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on July 25, 2013, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further a certificate of appealability shall not issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c). /s/ Nancy Torresen United States District Judge Dated this 26th day of August, 2013
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
