MCLEAN et al v. DELHAIZE AMERICA et al, No. 1:2012cv00381 - Document 12 (D. Me. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion to Dismiss and adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 10 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ANDY R. MCLEAN, et al., PlaintiffS, v. DELHAIZE AMERICA, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:12-cv-00381-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 10) filed March 27, 2013, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4) is DENIED as to an ADA claim of discrimination based upon a violation of confidentiality provision of the ADA and GRANTED as to all claims, including Susan McLean s claim for slander, and as to all defendants except for Delhaize America, doing business as Progressive Distributors. . _/s/ George Z. Singal __ United States District Judge Dated this 16th day of April, 2013.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
