HARRIS v. MAGNUSSON et al, No. 1:2011cv00472 - Document 35 (D. Me. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE no. 29 By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (cef)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine ROBERT LEE HARRIS, JR., Plaintiff v. MARTIN A. MAGNUSSON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:11-cv-00472-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on August 3, 2012, her Recommended Decision (ECF No. 29). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 33) on August 20, 2012. The Government filed its Response to Plaintiff s Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 34) on August 30, 2012. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED. 3. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff s Motion to Stay (ECF No. 33) is DENIED. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 10th day of September, 2012.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
