ROWE v. BLAKE, No. 1:2007cv00086 - Document 8 (D. Me. 2007)
Court Description: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by HAROLD H ROWE, JR By Judge JOHN A. WOODCOCK JR.(jgw, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ROWE v. BLAKE Doc. 8 Case 1:07-cv-00086-JAW Document 8 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE HAROLD H. ROWE, JR., Plaintiff, v. CECIEL BLAKE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 07-86-B-W ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on June 29, 2007 her Recommended Decision. The Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommended Decision on July 6, 2007 and July 10, 2007. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff has 10 days to pay the filing fee, failing which, the complaint will be dismissed. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 13th day of July, 2007 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
