Ford v. Mahindra U S A Inc et al, No. 1:2019cv01376 - Document 45 (W.D. La. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's Memorandum Ruling [Doc. 39], granting Defendant, Twin City Fire Insurance Companys Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 32], is designated as the Court's final judgme nt pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The Courts dismissal in the Memorandum Ruling [Doc. 39] of all claims asserted by Plaintiff, Kenneth Ford, against Defendant, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, is herein designated as the Courts final and appealable judgment. Signed by Judge David C Joseph on 8/16/2021. (crt,Roaix, G)

Download PDF
Ford v. Mahindra U S A Inc et al Doc. 45 Case 1:19-cv-01376-DCJ-JPM Document 45 Filed 08/16/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 418 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION KENNETH FORD CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:19-CV-01376 VERSUS JUDGE DAVID C. JOSEPH MAHINDRA USA, INC., ET AL MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES MEMORANDUM ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT Before the Court is Defendant, TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF SEPARATE JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 58(a) AND TO CERTIFY JUDGMENT AS FINAL PURSUANT TO RULE 54(b). [ECF 42]. Finding no reason for delay, the Motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s Memorandum Ruling [Doc. 39], granting Defendant, Twin City Fire Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 32], is designated as the Court’s final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The Court’s dismissal in the Memorandum Ruling [Doc. 39] of all claims asserted by Plaintiff, Kenneth Ford, against Defendant, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, is herein designated as the Court’s final and appealable judgment. THUS, DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers on this 16th day of August 2021. _____________________________________ DAVID C. JOSEPH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.