Johnson v. State of Louisiana, No. 3:2023cv00539 - Document 5 (M.D. La. 2024)

Court Description: OPINION : Adopting 4 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A1 and that the Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims.Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 03/22/2024. (ELW)

Download PDF
Johnson v. State of Louisiana Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TERRY MICHAEL JOHNSON (#292732) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 23-539-JWD-RLB STATE OF LOUISIANA OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated March 1, 2024 (Doc. 4), to which no objection was filed, IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A1 and that the Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on March 22, 2024. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Plaintiff is advised that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) provides that, “In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section [Proceedings in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.