Delaune v. Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals, LLC et al, No. 3:2023cv00360 - Document 54 (M.D. La. 2024)
Court Description: OPINION adopting 52 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge; the claims of Plaintiff Cary Delaune against Defendants Michael A. Sassich, Mathew J. Notarangelo, and William M. Weber are dismissed with prejudice and the 38 Motion to Remand is denied. This matter is referred to the undersigned for a scheduling conference. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 3/22/2024. (JEG)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Delaune v. Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals, LLC et al Doc. 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CARY DELAUNE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 23-360-JWD-EWD KINDER MORGAN BULK TERMINALS, LLC, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated March 1, 2024 (Doc. 52) (with which this Court agrees), to which an objection was filed and considered (Doc. 53), and for reasons set forth in Knight v. Turner Indus. Grp., L.L.C., No. 23-469, 2024 WL 1053259, at *4–9 (M.D. La. Mar. 11, 2024) (deGravelles, J.), IT IS ORDERED that the claims of Plaintiff Cary Delaune against Defendants Michael A. Sassich, Mathew J. Notarangelo, and William M. Weber are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and that the Motion to Remand, (Doc. 38) filed by Plaintiff, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is referred to the undersigned for a scheduling conference.1 Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on March 22, 2024. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 Entry of a scheduling order was deferred pending resolution of the Motion. Rec. Doc. 40. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
