Miranda v. Alexander et al, No. 3:2021cv00535 - Document 35 (M.D. La. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION adopting 30 Report and Recommendations. Denying 21 Motion to Change Status from Pro Se to Sui Juris and Affidavit. Granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike, and Motion for Attorney's Fees, and that Plaintiff's federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 3/18/2022. (EDC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Miranda v. Alexander et al Doc. 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JENNIFER MIRANDA, on behalf of real party in interest M.M. and real party in interest S.M. CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-535-JWD-RLB VERSUS DAVID ALEXANDER, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated February 24, 2022, (Doc. 30), to which an objection (Doc. 34) was filed and considered; IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Change Status from Pro Se to Sui Juris and Affidavit (Doc. 21) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike, and Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. 19) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and that Plaintiff’s federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on March 18, 2022. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
