Hamilton v. Orr et al, No. 3:2021cv00199 - Document 58 (M.D. La. 2023)
Court Description: OPINION : Adopting the 56 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 50 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Hamiltons claims against Orr, Barton, Rheams, and Walker is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and that Hamiltons claims against Kayla Wolf are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on the Courts own motion, resulting in this action being dismissed in its entirety.Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 4/10/20023. (ELW)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hamilton v. Orr et al Doc. 58 Case 3:21-cv-00199-JWD-SDJ Document 58 04/10/23 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DAVID HAMILTON (#108298) CIVIL ACTION NO. VERSUS 21-199-JWD-SDJ JOHN ORR, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated March 22, 2023 (Doc. 56), to which an objection was filed and considered (Doc. 57); IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants John Orr, Trent Barton, Luke Rheams, and Omar Walker (Doc.50) is GRANTED, that Hamilton’s claims against Orr, Barton, Rheams, and Walker is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and that Hamilton’s claims against Kayla Wolf are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on the Court’s own motion, resulting in this action being dismissed in its entirety. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on April 10, 2023. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
