Allen v. Rheams et al, No. 3:2020cv00890 - Document 9 (M.D. La. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION adopting 8 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. This action is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A, counting thi s dismissal as a strike for Plaintiff, Silton Allen, (See Doc. 8 at 8 n.43.) This Court decline the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims. Leave to further amend, if sought, shall be denied.Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 02/02/2022. (NLT)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Allen v. Rheams et al Doc. 9 Case 3:20-cv-00890-JWD-EWD Document 9 02/02/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SILTON ALLEN (#476015) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 20-890-JWD-EWD TRENT BARTON, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated December 29, 2021 (Doc. 8), to which no objection was filed; IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 1915(e) and 1915A, counting this dismissal as a strike for Plaintiff, Silton Allen, (See Doc. 8 at 8 n.43.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that this Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that leave to further amend, if sought, shall be denied. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on February 2, 2022. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
