Kimble v. Moore et al, No. 3:2020cv00708 - Document 146 (M.D. La. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION adopting 133 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The 86 Motion to Withdraw, Motion to Strike is granting in part, dismissing the plaintiffs claims against defendants Mitchell, Doe, and Office of the Public Defender, without prejudice. The 111 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 9/7/2022. (ELW)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Kimble v. Moore et al Doc. 146 Case 3:20-cv-00708-JWD-RLB Document 146 09/07/22 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RAYMOND KIMBLE, III CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 20-708-JWD-RLB HILLAR C. MOORE, III, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated July 28, 2022, (Doc. 133), to which no objection was filed; IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 86) is granted in part, dismissing the plaintiff’s claims against defendants Mitchell, Doe, and Office of the Public Defender, without prejudice. In all other regards, the plaintiff’s motion is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s duplicate Motion (Doc. 111), filed with regards to Defendants Mitchell, is denied as moot. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on September 7, 2022. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
