Armant v. LeBlanc et al, No. 3:2019cv00815 - Document 28 (M.D. La. 2020)

Court Description: OPINION Adopting 16 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Granting in part and denying in part 9 13 MOTIONS for Leave to Amend Complaint. To the extent Plaintiff continues to allege claims against James M. LeBlanc, those claim s will not be considered because allegations regarding LeBlanc's handling of Plaintiff's grievance, and suggestions that LeBlanc should be liable because he must have been aware of Plaintiff's complaints, do not state a claim. To the extent the proposed amendments add factual information for claims other than those against James LeBlanc, the Motions for Leave to Amend Complaint is granted. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 11/16/2020. (EDC)

Download PDF
Armant v. LeBlanc et al Doc. 28 Case 3:19-cv-00815-JWD-EWD Document 28 11/16/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA EDDIE J. ARMANT (#150261) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 19-815-JWD-EWD JAMES M. LeBLANC, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 16) dated October 21, 2020, to which objections were filed and considered (Docs. 21, 22, 23 and 27); IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motions for Leave to Amend Complaint (Docs. 9 and 13) are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. To the extent Plaintiff continues to allege claims against James M. LeBlanc, those claims will not be considered because allegations regarding LeBlanc’s handling of Plaintiff’s grievance, and suggestions that LeBlanc should be liable because he must have been aware of Plaintiff’s complaints, do not state a claim. To the extent the proposed amendments add factual information for claims other than those against James LeBlanc, the Motions for Leave to Amend Complaint is granted. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on November 16, 2020. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.