Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections, No. 3:2018cv00191 - Document 101 (M.D. La. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION Adopting 98 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge; finding as moot 66 . Motion to Dismiss 85 granting in part and denying in part as to the plaintiffs claims for monetary damages asserted against defendant Holmes in h is official capacity. It is further ordered that the Motion (R. Doc. 85) is denied as to the plaintiff's claim for excessive force asserted against defendant Holmes, and in all other regards is denied as moot. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 04/30/2019. (ELW)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections Doc. 101 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA COREY MARQUEE ADAMS (#357624) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 18-191-JWD-RLB LOUISIANA DEPT. OF CORR., ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated April 22, 2019, to which an opposition (R. Doc.100) was filed; IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of remaining defendants S. Lamartiniere, Smith, Dr. Lavespere, Dr. Gamble, Bellamy, Adams, and other defendants previously dismissed (R. Doc. 36), is granted in part, dismissing the plaintiff’s claims for monetary damages asserted against the defendants in their official capacities, and dismissing the plaintiff’s claims in their entirety against defendants S. Lamartiniere, Dr. Lavespere, Dr. Gamble and Bellamy with prejudice. It is further ordered that the Motion (R. Doc. 36) is denied as to the plaintiff’s claims for deliberate indifference to his health and safety asserted against defendants Smith and Adams in their individual capacities, and in all other regards is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of defendant Hayden (R. Doc. 66) is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of remaining defendant Holmes and other defendants previously dismissed (R. Doc. 85) is granted in part as to the plaintiff’s claims for monetary damages asserted against defendant Holmes in his Dockets.Justia.com official capacity. It is further ordered that the Motion (R. Doc. 85) is denied as to the plaintiff’s claim for excessive force asserted against defendant Holmes, and in all other regards is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction in connection with the plaintiff’s potential state law claims, and this matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings herein. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on April 30, 2019. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
