Douglas v. Nakamoto et al, No. 3:2018cv00128 - Document 7 (M.D. La. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION Adopting 6 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. All federal claims are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, as legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. The Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims. Judgment shall be entered. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 10/19/2020. (NLT)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Douglas v. Nakamoto et al Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LEONARD DOUGLAS (#601998) CIVIL ACTION NO. VERSUS 18-128-JWD-EWD CHRIS NAKAMOTO, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 6) dated May 12, 2020, to which no objection was filed; IT IS ORDERED that all federal claims are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, as legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A.1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on October 19, 2020. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 Plaintiff is advised that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) provides that, “In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section [Proceedings in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
