Harrison et al v. Sweazy et al, No. 3:2017cv00487 - Document 10 (M.D. La. 2019)

Court Description: OPINION Adopting 9 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Plaintiffs claims against all defendants, other than the City of Baton Rouge Office of Community Development and the City of Baton Rouge Human Resources, are DISMISSED W ITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claimpursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and Plaintiffs claims against all defendants, including the City of Baton Rouge Office of Community Development and the City of Baton Rouge Human Resource s, arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). FURTHER, Plaintiffs claims against the City of Baton Rouge Office of Community Development and the City of Baton Rouge Human Resources arising under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Genetic Information Nondisclosure Act are maintained, subject to the requirement that Plaintiff file her Amended Complaint in accordance with the report and recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judgewithin thirty (30) days of this opinion. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 04/18/2019. (NLT)

Download PDF
Harrison et al v. Sweazy et al Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CATHY L. HARRISON VERSUS THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE-PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE, OFFICE OF THE MAYOR-PRESIDENT, OFFICE OF COMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, ET AL. OPINION CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-487-JWD-RLB After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated April 3, 2019, to which no opposition was filed; IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against all defendants, other than the City of Baton Rouge Office of Community Development and the City of Baton Rouge Human Resources, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against all defendants, including the City of Baton Rouge Office of Community Development and the City of Baton Rouge Human Resources, arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against the City of Baton Rouge Office of Community Development and the City of Baton Rouge Human Resources arising under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Genetic Information Nondisclosure Act are maintained, subject to the requirement that Plaintiff file her Amended Dockets.Justia.com Complaint in accordance with the report and recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge within thirty (30) days of this opinion. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on April 18, 2019. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.