Zornes v. Cain et al, No. 3:2017cv00204 - Document 25 (M.D. La. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION: The plaintiffs claims against defendant Burl Cain are dismissed,without prejudice, for failure to timely serve this defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Further, defendants 15 Motion to Dismiss (R. Doc. 15) is g ranted, dismissing all claims against defendants Lavespere, Falgout, and LeBlanc with prejudice. The Court declines to the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction in connection with the plaintiffs potential state law claims. Judgment shall be signed accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 12/6/2018. (SWE)

Download PDF
Zornes v. Cain et al Doc. 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JERRY L. ZORNES (#419089) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 17-204-JWD-RLB BURL CAIN, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated November 20, 2018, to which no opposition was filed; IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff’s claims against defendant Burl Cain are dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to timely serve this defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (R. Doc. 15) is granted, dismissing all claims against defendants Lavespere, Falgout, and LeBlanc with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction in connection with the plaintiff’s potential state law claims. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on December 6, 2018. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.