LaVergne v. Vaughn et al, No. 3:2016cv00400 - Document 112 (M.D. La. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION Adopting 108 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 78 Motion for Summary Judgment of defendants Michael Vaughn and Bruce Dodd is granted, dismissing the plaintiffs' claims asserted against them, with prejudice . The plaintiff's 102 Counter Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, and the pending 75 and 76 Motions in Limine and 104 Motion for Summons are denied as moot, and this action shall be dismissed. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 4/3/2019. (SWE)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
LaVergne v. Vaughn et al Doc. 112 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BRANDON S. LAVERGNE (#424227), ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 16-400-JWD-RLB MICHAEL VAUGHN, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated March 21, 2019, to which an opposition was filed (Doc. 111); IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendants Michael Vaughn and Bruce Dodd (R. Doc. 78), is granted, dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims asserted against them, with prejudice. IT IS FURHTER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s “Counter Motion for Summary Judgment” (R. Doc. 102) is denied, and the pending Motions in Limine (R. Docs. 75, 76) and Motion for Summons (R. Doc. 104) are denied as moot, and that this action shall be dismissed. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on April 3, 2019. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
