Goodlow v. LeBlanc et al, No. 3:2015cv00788 - Document 10 (M.D. La. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION Adopting 9 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs action is dismissed, with prejudice, as legally frivolousand for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)and 1915A. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 05/08/2017. (ELW)

Download PDF
Goodlow v. LeBlanc et al Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERNON GOODLOW (# 93838) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 15-0788-JWD-EWD JAMES LeBLANC, ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated April 19, 2017, to which no objection was filed: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s action is dismissed, with prejudice, as legally frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A.1 Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on May 8, 2017. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 The plaintiff is advised that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) provides that, “In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section [Proceedings in forma pauperis ]if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.