Norman v. H&E Equipment Services, Inc. et al, No. 3:2014cv00367 - Document 20 (M.D. La. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION Adopting the 15 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and denying 9 , 10 Motions to Remand. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 12/17/2014. (LLH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Norman v. H&E Equipment Services, Inc. et al Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RICHARD NORMAN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 14-367-JWD-SCR H & E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Supplemental Magistrate Judge's Report dated September 9, 2014, to which no objection was filed: IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (R. Docs. 9 & 10) is DENIED. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on December 17, 2014. S JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
