Cedar Lodge Plantation, LLC et al v. CSHV Fairway View I, LLC et al, No. 3:2013cv00129 - Document 271 (M.D. La. 2017)

Court Description: RULING AND ORDER: The 223 Motion for Reconsideration or, Alternatively,Motion to Amend filed by Cedar Lodge is DENIED. The 224 Motion for Certificate of Appealability filed by Cedar Lodge is DENIED. The 225 Motion for Reconsideration Pur suant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) filed by Fairway View is GRANTED. Therefore, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, Cedar Lodge's claims for restoration of its property and lost businessopportunity are DISMISSED WITH PRE JUDICE. The 231 Motion for Reconsideration on Order Granting STS's 231 Motion for Summary Judgment filed byCedar Lodge is DENIED. Suresh Sharma, Cedar Lodge's proposed expert, is hereby DISQUALIFIED from testifying as an expert at trial. The 229 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Testimony Regarding the Alleged Cost to Drain the Pond filed by Fairway View is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED AS MOOTIN PART. The 236 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Testimony Regarding Alleged Sewage Discharges Mter1/29/2013 filed by Fairway View is DENIED.The 226 , 227 , 230 , and 237 Motions for Expedited Hearing and the 228 Motion for Oral Argument filed bythe parties are DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 9/6/2017. (LLH)