Vincent v. Noland et al, No. 3:2012cv00005 - Document 5 (M.D. La. 2012)

Court Description: OPINION Adopting 4 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Court finds that this action should be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure of the plaintiff to pay the court's filing fee. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 3/7/2012. (LSM)

Download PDF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA HAROLD VINCENT (#73128) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 12-5-FJP-DLD CHRISTINE NOLAND, ET AL O P I N I O N After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report1 to which no objection was filed: The Court finds that this action should be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure of the plaintiff to pay the Court's filing fee. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, March 7, 2012. S FRANK J. POLOZOLA MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 Rec. Doc. No. 4. Doc#47741

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.