Stockstill v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al, No. 3:2010cv00095 - Document 33 (M.D. La. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION Adopting 26 and 29 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Supplemental and Amending Motion to Remand filed by the pla shall be denied. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 04/13/2011. (NLT)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MELINDA STOCKSTILL, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NUMBER 10-95-FJP-SCR WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL. OPINION After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Reports1 to which objections2 were filed: IT IS ORDERED that the Supplemental and Amending Motion to Remand filed by plaintiff Melinda Stockstill, individually and on behalf of her minor children, Emily Stockstill and Maizie Stockstill, shall be denied.3 Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April 13, 2011. S FRANK J. POLOZOLA MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 Rec. Doc. Nos. 26 and 29. 2 Rec. Doc. Nos. 25 and 28(filed into the record by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart of Louisiana, LLC, and Unarco Industries, LLC as oppositions to the motions to remand). 3 Rec. Doc. Nos. 21 and 27. Doc#47171
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
