In re: In the Matter of Offshore Oil Services, Inc., No. 2:2021cv01522 - Document 91 (E.D. La. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER AND REASONS: denying 90 Motion for Reconsideration re 86 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Offshore Oil Services, Inc. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 04/25/2023. (cs)

Download PDF
In re: In the Matter of Offshore Oil Services, Inc. Doc. 91 Case 2:21-cv-01522-SM-JVM Document 91 Filed 04/25/23 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN THE MATTER OF OFFSHORE OIL SERVICES, INC. CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-1522 SECTION: “E” (2) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is a Motion for Reconsideration filed by Third Party Plaintiff Offshore Oil Services, Inc. (“Offshore”).1 For the reasons that follow, Offshore’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. LAW AND ANALYSIS On March 22, 2023, this Court entered its Order and Reasons granting summary judgment in favor of Third Party Defendant Island Operating Company, Inc. (“IOC”) and against Offshore with respect to Offshore’s indemnity claim and indemnity insurance coverage claim.2 The Court denied IOC’s motion for summary judgment with respect to Offshore’s claim for defense costs.3 In partially granting IOC’s motion for summary judgment, the Court applied, inter alia, the “maritime contract” analysis formulated by the Fifth Circuit in In re Larry Doiron, Inc.4 The Court found the reasoning of a recent case out of the Eastern District of Louisiana, In the Matter of Aries Marine Corporation, et al., persuasive in its application of Doiron’s framework.5 R. Doc. 90. R. Doc. 86. 3 Id. 4 Id. at p. 11 (laying out the framework announced in In re Larry Doiroin, Inc., 879 F.3d 568, 569 (5th Cir. 2018) (en banc)). 5 Id. at p. 18 (“The Court finds the reasoning of Aries Marine highly persuasive.”). 1 2 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-01522-SM-JVM Document 91 Filed 04/25/23 Page 2 of 2 Following this Court’s ruling, a motion for reconsideration was filed in Aries Marine.6 Solely on this basis, Offshore filed the instant April 19, 2023 Motion for Reconsideration of this Court’s March 22, 2023 Order and Reasons because “an alteration or modification of the Aries Marine ruling may materially affect the Court’s ruling here.”7 On April 24, 2023, the district judge presiding over Aries Marine denied reconsideration.8 As a result, and because Offshore’s Motion for Reconsideration is predicated entirely on reconsideration in Aries Marine, the Court finds Offshore has presented no basis for the Court to reconsider the March 22, 2023 Order and Reasons. Accordingly; IT IS ORDERED that Offshore’s Motion for Reconsideration9 is DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 25th day of April, 2023. ________________________________ SUSIE MORGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In the Matter of Aries Marine Corporation, et al., Civ. A. 19-10850, R. Doc. 297 (E.D. La. 4/24/2023) (Africk, J.) (denying R. Doc. 260, motion for reconsideration). 7 R. Doc. 90-1 at p. 5. 8 In the Matter of Aries Marine Corporation, et al., Civ. A. 19-10850, R. Doc. 297 (E.D. La. 4/24/2023) (Africk, J.) (denying R. Doc. 260, motion for reconsideration). 9 R. Doc. 90. 6 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.