Great Lakes Insurance, S.E. v. Gray Group Investments, LLC, No. 2:2020cv02795 - Document 75 (E.D. La. 2021)
Court Description: Minute Order - ORDER AND REASONS for Motion Hearing held on 6/21/2021 before Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault: Considering the record, the oral and written arguments and representations of counsel, and the applicable law, for these reasons and as those more fully stated on the record; IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 62 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donna Phillips Currault on 6/21/2021. (Court Reporter Sandy Minutillo.) (sa)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Great Lakes Insurance, S.E. v. Gray Group Investments, LLC Doc. 75 MINUTE ENTRY CURRAULT, M. J. JUNE 21, 2021 MJSTAR 0:24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GREAT LAKES INSURANCE, S.E. * CIVIL ACTION VERSUS * NO. 20-2795 GRAY GROUP INVESTMENTS, LLC * SECTION “R” (2) ORDER AND REASONS Oral argument was conducted in person on Plaintiff Great Lakes Insurance, S.E.’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 62) of its Motion to Compel (ECF No. 46), resolved by my Order and Reasons (ECF No. 60), and for which Plaintiff requested oral argument. ECF Nos. 64, 68. Defendant Gray Group Investments, LLC opposed the motion. ECF No. 67. Participating were: Todd G. Crawford for Plaintiff; Michael H. Bagot Jr. for Defendant Other than its disagreement with my prior decision, Plaintiff has not established any independent reason for reconsideration. Plaintiff has not identified any newly discovered evidence or new argument that was not or could not have been urged previously, nor has it established any manifest error of law or fact or intervening change in the law. 1 Accordingly, considering the record, the oral and written arguments and representations of counsel, and the applicable law, for these reasons and as those more fully stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 62) is DENIED. ___________________________________ DONNA PHILLIPS CURRAULT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 See Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, 303 F.3d 571, 581 (5th Cir. 2002) (citations omitted); Browning v. Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (5th Cir. 1990) (citations omitted); Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990); Waltman v. Int'l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 1989). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
